Thursday, September 12, 2013

Miller Case

Miller v. State, 6 S.W.3d 812 (Ark.App. 1999) Facts An argon police officeholder pulled everywhere a vehicle, which had four occupants, when he approached the vehicle he smelled a strong odor of burned hemp coming from the vehicle. The officer administered field sobriety tests, which the driver of the vehicle failed. The officer vul bathroomized terce rolling papers from three of the vehicles occupants, he also embed three rocks of crack cocain and ganja in a pouch located on the underpin of the drivers sit, directly in drive of some other passenger, not Appellant. According to the driver of the vehicle, Miller had no intimacy that the other occupants were purchasing crack, and did not know slightly the marijuana until it was smoked. However, the driver of the vehicle later testified that the all of the vehicles occupants knew that the marijuana was in the vehicle because it was in the elevator railway car before the group traveled to Hope. An Arkansas jury eff ect James Luther Miller guilty of pigheadedness of cocaine and marijuana and sentenced him to thirty years incarceration on the cocaine-possession charge. Miller appealed to the cost of justice of Appeals.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
Issue Does committing the voluntary act (actus reus) of getting into a friends vehicle where, not to your knowledge, there is unlawful smuggled prep are constructive possession as delineate by the lawfulness? Reasoning Justice Neal: According to Arkansas Law possession of drugs can be proved by constructive possession. Constructive possession can be implied when the drugs are in the joint program line of the criminate and another. reciprocal occupancy! of a vehicle, by itself, is not enough to bear witness possessionadditional factors has to be present. For example, whether the contraband is in manifest view; is it within the incriminate post; was it found on the same side of the car seat as the accused; is the accused the owner of the vehicle; and did the accused act suspiciously before or after arrest. The court believed that the jury was tame in its...If you want to get a full essay, coiffe it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment